HyperObserve vs New Relic

Compare zero-instrumentation monitoring with traditional APM. See why teams are switching to HyperObserve for simpler, faster deployment.

Key Differences at a Glance

Deployment

HyperObserve: 5 minutes
New Relic: Days to weeks

Performance

HyperObserve: <5% overhead
New Relic: 3-10% overhead

Implementation

HyperObserve: Zero code changes
New Relic: SDK integration

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

FeatureHyperObserveNew Relic
Implementation
Zero code changes, eBPF-based
Requires agent installation in every app
Performance Overhead
<5% CPU overhead
3-10% CPU overhead from agents
Time to Deploy
5 minutes, no code changes
Days to weeks for full coverage
Pricing Model
Simple per-host pricing
User-based pricing can be expensive
Language Support
All languages, kernel-level
Major languages with SDKs
Database Monitoring
MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis - zero config
Requires database agents
Kubernetes Support
No sidecars needed
Requires cluster agent + sidecars
Platform Support
Linux (full), Windows/macOS (limited)
Wide platform support
Real User Monitoring
Lightweight RUM included
Advanced browser monitoring
AI/ML Features
85%+ accuracy anomaly detection
AI-powered insights

Note: HyperObserve's eBPF-based monitoring requires Linux kernel 4.14+ for full features. Windows and macOS support basic monitoring without eBPF capabilities.

Pricing Comparison

HyperObserve

Free Trial

$0

7 days, no credit card

Pro

$99/host

All features included

✓ Simple, predictable pricing

✓ No hidden costs

✓ All features in one price

New Relic

Free Tier

$0

100GB/month limit

Pro

$99/user

Plus data costs

⚠ User-based pricing

⚠ Additional data charges

⚠ Complex pricing calculator

How They Work

HyperObserve: eBPF Technology

Kernel-Level Monitoring

Uses eBPF to capture data at the kernel level without touching application code

Zero Instrumentation

No SDK integration, no code changes, no restarts required

Universal Coverage

Works with any language or framework automatically

New Relic: Agent-Based

Application-Level Agents

Requires installing language-specific agents in each application

Code Instrumentation

Must modify application code and configuration files

Language-Specific

Different agents for Java, Python, Node.js, etc.

Switching from New Relic to HyperObserve

1

Deploy HyperObserve Agent

Install our lightweight agent on your infrastructure. No application changes needed.

2

Compare Metrics Side-by-Side

Run both solutions in parallel to verify HyperObserve captures all your data.

3

Recreate Dashboards

Use our templates or migration tools to recreate your New Relic dashboards.

4

Remove New Relic Agents

Once verified, remove New Relic agents and enjoy improved performance.

Why Teams Switch from New Relic

"New Relic's user-based pricing was killing us. We saved 70% by switching to HyperObserve's simple per-host model."

Alex Thompson

CTO, ScaleUp Inc.

"Deploying New Relic across our microservices took months. HyperObserve was monitoring everything in 5 minutes."

Maria Garcia

DevOps Lead, TechFlow

"The performance impact of New Relic agents was noticeable. HyperObserve's eBPF approach has almost no overhead."

James Wilson

Principal Engineer, FastAPI

Experience the Difference

See why teams are switching from New Relic to HyperObserve

No credit card required • 5 minute setup • Cancel anytime

Compare HyperObserve with Other Tools