A Better Way to Monitor
Traditional monitoring tools require extensive setup, code changes, and multiple platforms. HyperObserve uses eBPF to see everything automatically.
Side-by-Side Comparison
See the difference between traditional approaches and modern observability
| Feature | Traditional Tools | HyperObserve |
|---|---|---|
| Setup Time | Weeks to months of implementation | 5 minutes to full visibility |
| Code Changes Required | SDK integration in every service | Zero code changes needed |
| Coverage | Only instrumented services | 100% automatic discovery |
| Database Monitoring | Limited or requires plugins | MySQL, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, and more |
| Performance Overhead | 5-30% CPU overhead | <2% with eBPF technology |
| Pricing Model | Complex, multi-metric pricing | Simple, transparent pricing |
| Tool Consolidation | Multiple tools needed | All-in-one platform |
| AI/ML Capabilities | Basic or add-on features | Built-in predictive analytics |
Complete Platform Capabilities
Everything you need in one solution, no additional tools required
Application Performance Monitoring
Traditional
HyperObserve
Infrastructure Monitoring
Traditional
HyperObserve
Log Management
Traditional
HyperObserve
Database Performance
Traditional
HyperObserve
Real User Monitoring
Traditional
HyperObserve
Security Threat Detection
Traditional
HyperObserve
Service Mesh Monitoring
Traditional
HyperObserve
Predictive Analytics
Traditional
HyperObserve
Automatic Service Discovery
Traditional
HyperObserve
Zero-Instrumentation APM
Traditional
HyperObserve
Experience the Difference
See why teams are switching to modern observability